High muck-a-mucks and wannabe bosses (insert facetious remark here), egomaniacs who are legends in their own minds. I know one who fits the bill.  

Yep, there's one thing better than a fallen idol..... a tripped up one.  

And what's the best way to trip one up?  Dig up a pile of dirt and put it where he's bound to trip over it.

Doing some research and from what I gather Peterson has been misinterpreting C-16. This is according to legal experts.

Peterson seems to be a jerk.

So men, you're in a real busy bar when a woman's breast pops out of her top.

A: Do you draw attention so everyone notices it?

B: Do you inform her of the mishap and see a hugely embarrassed red face that alerts everyone anyway?

C: Do you behave all gentleman-like, think of her potential embarrassment, and gently cup the protruding tit in one hand, pull out her top in the other and place the jubbly bit back before anyone notices?

Hmmmm!!!!  Each decision has inappropriate written all over it, though B is probably the safest... other than walk away, pretending you saw nothing after getting pics on your smart phone.

I wouldn't go with A because I'm simply not that generous in a bar full of inebriated blokes.  If they weren't alert enough to see it then tough titties.

As for C, well I don't mind playing the hero: "Look, love, it popped out and I just popped it back in for you before the whole bar noticed and embarrassed you."

Besides, I haven't touched one of those things in an eternity, so it'd kill two birds with one stone and I'd have that gooey feeling good feeling all over.

Yup, the inappropriate may just be 'appropriate' in some instances.  What are your thoughts?  Which would you choose: A, B or C?

I wouldn't do anything at all starkers, just ignore it and let her handle it however she wants.

Exactly. Keep my trap shut and look the other way. The upside is you'll always have the memory.

No sense of adventure.  

No sense of adventure or daring.      

I dunno, are we Aussies the only ones who'd play the hero in order to cop a handful?      

Am I the only one willing to cop a spontaneous slap for handling the merchandise without prior approval?  C'mon blokes, Phoon, MadDeez and others of mischievous persuasion, what would you do?

Not sure where this thread has wandered off to...but re this question...a close friend of mine fell out of her bathers one time years ago at the beach and I figured it was only appropriate to let her know..cos she hadn't as yet noticed...

Some time later I did a portrait of her [in conte] ...she was the [then] wife of a long-time mate of mine...and she always claimed I had a 'lend of reality' when it came to her boob-size ....except I could always argue...nope...I'd seen them 'rampant' ...

Not so sure, either, but the question of how inappropriate each option is/would be has been on my mind since summer began.  Yup, it's that time of year when boobies tend to be more free-flowing and find that being out there in the great outdoors is more appealing more often, and I just wanted to know what other dirty old men would do when faced with an errant boob or two.  You know, like a bit of advice that may prevent prolonged procrastination.... or not.

After how long.... before you let her know?

Had it been me, I probably would have procrastinated a while.... then: "By the way, [insert name here] your chest thingies have been hanging out for a few minutes.  Just thought you oughta know."

Ha-Ha!!!!  To have seen them... er, know they were 'rampant', you must've procrastinated a while as well.

Nothing wrong with that.     

True story. Long before I got my own place I stayed at a day room and there was this really good looking blonde whose problem was an errant waistband. Sitting down and watching TV she walked in front of me and nearly a third of her butt crack was visible. I don't mind saying that I enjoyed the sight but courtesy won out and I told one of the aides, a female, to tell her that her butt was exposed. I thought it was better to spare her the embarrassment by not making it so obvious as the TV room was quite full. To this day I still have a clear memory of it as her backside was sooooo cute. Lol 

True story!  Back in the 70's I was out buying baby clothes with my first wife one Friday after work, and yup, I was confronted with a situation, like the scenario above, where a woman's booby fell out.  It popped out while she was leaning over to get something from the very back of the shelf for her very pregnant companion... who couldn't reach.

Anyhow, the upshot of it all, being as sassy as all buggery back then, and full of gentlemanly bravado... I mean concern, I took option C and gently popped it back in her top for her: "There you go." I chirped.

For my effort, well I got a darned good slap across the jowls.... but not from the woman whose breast I had just fondle.... er, put back where it belonged.  She realised what I had done and why, I guess, so she thanked me.

No, the slap came from my [also] very pregnant [then] wife, who took exception to my kindly deed.

Oops!

Peterson a jerk? How many videos of him did you see, if any?

Just name one or two things he said (with source, please) which, in your opinion, make him a jerk.

As for Bill C-16 being misinterpreted... Aren't you perhaps being a bit naive?

I think Peterson was clear in his discussion of C-16 that he was referring to the dangers of this law as interpreted by the *Human Rights tribunals* (as he discussed being levied a fine and then going to jail on non-payment, which seems to suggest tribunals rather than the court system). He might have overstated some aspects, but I don't think he overstated the potential consequences.

In fact, the very nasty consequences of political correctness are now in plain sight for everyone to see. People these days are ALREADY afraid to speak their minds lest they lose their jobs or something worse.

The bottom line is that Bill C-16 is a law that controls what you can and cannot *say*. If that doesn't make you nervous regarding the potential to limit and harm free speech, it should. This is how it ALWAYS starts: bit by bit, and ALWAYS under the guise of a 'noble cause'. The real motives, however, are far darker: it is really about the control some groups want to exert over you.

The truth is, the true motive is always much darker when it comes to law making, and too often, lawmakers espouse laws that are supposed to be for the common good, when in fact there is a hidden agenda which is far from being for the common good.

For mine, this Bill C-16 is political correctness completely out of control.  When the authorities legislate against, and can potentially imprison people for various words and phrases, there is something abundantly wrong and we, as a society, lose even more liberties and freedoms.  And what's even more annoying, is that many of the minority groups who lobby for these sorts of laws are often the worst offenders, complaining about offensive remarks while all the time they themselves dish them out in spades.

The other thing that pisses me off is just how much real crime -serious crime - goes by without prosecution and is unpunished.   I mean, seriously, a person could be imprisoned for uttering a few words, yet real criminals get away with murder, etc?  Like I said, there is something abundantly wrong.